DrHint logoDrHint

PCB Trace Width vs Current Capacity Calculator (IPC-2152 Standard)

Undersized PCB traces overheat, degrade, and can eventually fail open under sustained current, while oversized traces waste valuable board space. This calculator applies the IPC-2152 empirical formula to compute the minimum safe trace width for your current, temperature rise, copper weight, and layer location.

Minimum trace width
108.9 mils
2.77 mm
Cross-section area
150 mils²
External layer
Resistance per inch
4.7790 Ω/in
1oz copper
Voltage drop
23.895 V/in
119.476 W/in dissipated

For 5.00A at 10°C rise on 1oz external copper, use at least a 108.9 mil (2.77mm) trace.

Trace design breakdown
MetricValue
Continuous current5.00 A
Allowable temp rise10°C
Copper weight1 oz
Layer typeExternal
Cross-section area150 mils²
Minimum trace width108.9 mils (2.77 mm)
Voltage drop per inch23.895 V

Formula & step-by-step maths

1.Area(mils²) = (Current / (k × TempRise^0.44))^(1/0.725)
2.TraceWidth(mils) = Area / (CopperOz × 1.378)
3.Resistance/in(Ω) ≈ 717 / Area(mils²)
k
0.048 external layer, 0.024 internal layer
TempRise
Allowable temperature rise in °C

Why external and internal traces differ

Internal traces are surrounded by insulating FR4 material and dissipate heat far less efficiently than external traces exposed to open air, so IPC-2152 uses a lower k-constant (0.024 vs 0.048) requiring roughly double the width for the same current and temperature rise.

Understanding the IPC-2152 curve

IPC-2152 replaced the older IPC-2221 standard with more accurate empirical curves derived from thermal testing on real boards, accounting for heat spreading, board thickness, and copper pour proximity more realistically than the older simplified formula.

Copper weight and trace width tradeoffs

Doubling copper weight (e.g. 1oz to 2oz) roughly halves the required trace width for the same current, since more copper volume conducts and dissipates heat more efficiently per unit of board area.

Voltage drop matters for long traces

Even a correctly-sized trace for thermal safety can cause unacceptable voltage drop over long distances, especially in low-voltage logic circuits — always check voltage drop separately for traces longer than a few inches.

IPC-2152 reference trace widths (external, 10°C rise, 1oz copper)

CurrentApprox. width (mils)Approx. width (mm)
1 A12 mils0.30 mm
2 A24 mils0.61 mm
3 A37 mils0.94 mm
5 A68 mils1.73 mm
10 A160 mils4.06 mm
15 A260 mils6.60 mm

People also ask

How wide should a PCB trace be for 5 amps?

For 5A continuous current with 1oz external copper and a 10°C temperature rise, a trace width of roughly 68 mils (1.73mm) is typically required per IPC-2152.

Why does temperature rise allowance change trace width?

Allowing a higher temperature rise (e.g. 20°C or 30°C instead of 10°C) lets the trace safely carry more current at the same width, since IPC-2152 permits more heat buildup before failure risk.

Is IPC-2152 more accurate than IPC-2221?

Yes, IPC-2152 was developed from newer empirical thermal test data across many board configurations and generally produces more realistic (often narrower) trace widths than the older 2221 chart.

How much does copper weight affect trace width?

Doubling copper weight from 1oz to 2oz can reduce the required trace width by roughly half for the same current and temperature rise, since more copper cross-section conducts heat and current more efficiently.

Do internal traces really need to be twice as wide?

Approximately yes — internal traces are thermally insulated by the PCB substrate, so IPC-2152 uses a k-constant half that of external traces, roughly doubling the required width for equivalent thermal performance.

What temperature rise should I design for?

10°C is a conservative default for most consumer electronics; 20°C is acceptable for industrial designs with adequate enclosure ventilation, while power electronics may tolerate 30°C+ with proper heatsinking.

How do I calculate voltage drop on a long trace?

Multiply the trace's resistance-per-inch (derived from its cross-sectional area) by both the current and the total trace length in inches to get total voltage drop.

Does trace width calculation account for copper pours next to the trace?

No, IPC-2152 assumes isolated traces; nearby copper pours or ground planes can improve heat dissipation, potentially allowing slightly narrower traces in practice.

What's a safe minimum trace width for signal (non-power) traces?

Signal traces carrying negligible current are typically sized for manufacturing tolerance and impedance control (often 4-8 mils) rather than current capacity.

Can I use wider traces than calculated for extra safety margin?

Yes, going wider than the IPC-2152 minimum only improves thermal margin and reduces resistance, at the cost of additional board space.

Three worked examples

Same engine, three different starting points — useful if you want to see how sensitive the answer is before you type your own numbers in.

Example 1: continuous current 3.9 A, allowable temperature rise "10°C"

Minimum trace width
77.3 mils
1.96 mm
Cross-section area
106 mils²
External layer
Resistance per inch
6.7325 Ω/in
1oz copper
Voltage drop
26.257 V/in
102.401 W/in dissipated

On the lower / more conservative end. For 3.90A at 10°C rise on 1oz external copper, use at least a 77.3 mil (1.96mm) trace.

Example 2: continuous current 5 A, allowable temperature rise "10°C"

Minimum trace width
108.9 mils
2.77 mm
Cross-section area
150 mils²
External layer
Resistance per inch
4.7790 Ω/in
1oz copper
Voltage drop
23.895 V/in
119.476 W/in dissipated

A typical middle-of-the-road setup. For 5.00A at 10°C rise on 1oz external copper, use at least a 108.9 mil (2.77mm) trace.

Example 3: continuous current 6.5 A, allowable temperature rise "20°C"

Minimum trace width
102.7 mils
2.61 mm
Cross-section area
141 mils²
External layer
Resistance per inch
5.0684 Ω/in
1oz copper
Voltage drop
32.945 V/in
214.141 W/in dissipated

On the higher / more demanding end. For 6.50A at 20°C rise on 1oz external copper, use at least a 102.7 mil (2.61mm) trace.

Quick answers about the PCB Trace Width & Current Capacity

What exactly does the PCB Trace Width & Current Capacity work out?

Undersized PCB traces overheat, degrade, and can eventually fail open under sustained current, while oversized traces waste valuable board space. You enter continuous current, allowable temperature rise, copper weight and trace location and the result panel updates straight away, so you can compare two or three versions of the same question in a few seconds.

What do I need before I start?

Only 4 fields: continuous current, allowable temperature rise, copper weight and trace location. Nothing else is needed and nothing is stored.

How is it calculated — why external and internal traces differ?

Internal traces are surrounded by insulating FR4 material and dissipate heat far less efficiently than external traces exposed to open air, so IPC-2152 uses a lower k-constant (0. The same maths runs inside this page, so hand-checking the result on paper gives you the identical figure.

Why do two calculators give me different answers for pCB Trace Width & Current Capacity?

IPC-2152 replaced the older IPC-2221 standard with more accurate empirical curves derived from thermal testing on real boards, accounting for heat spreading, board thickness, and copper pour proximity more realistically than the older simplified formula. Different sites pick different assumptions, so always check which method a calculator states before you trust the gap between two numbers.

What does the "IPC-2152 reference trace widths (external, 10°C rise, 1oz copper)" table on this page tell me?

It is the reference range this tool works against — 6 rows from "1 A" (12 mils) up to "15 A" (260 mils). Use it to sanity-check whether the number you just calculated sits where you expected it to.

Which allowable temperature rise should I pick?

The dropdown offers 3 choices — 10°C, 20°C and 30°C. Pick the one that matches your real situation rather than the one you would like to be true; allowable temperature rise usually moves the final figure more than any other single input, so it is worth running it twice with the option above and below your guess.

Do I have to press a button or reload the page to see the result?

No. PCB Trace Width & Current Capacity runs completely inside your browser, so the moment you change a value the cards recalculate — there is no submit step, no page reload and no waiting for a server round trip. That also means it keeps working on a weak or intermittent mobile connection.

Is it free, and do you keep what I type?

It is free with no sign-up, no app install and no usage limit. Nothing you enter into PCB Trace Width & Current Capacity leaves your device — the calculation is JavaScript running locally, so there is no upload of your figures to DrHint or anyone else.

Can I use it on a phone?

Yes — the layout stacks to a single column on small screens and the number fields open the numeric keypad on both Android and iOS. Many people bookmark this page or add it to their home screen and re-open it whenever the question comes up.

Anything to be careful about with the result?

For 5A continuous current with 1oz external copper and a 10°C temperature rise, a trace width of roughly 68 mils (1. Treat the output as a well-grounded estimate for planning, not as a professional, legal or medical decision on its own.

Next useful tool